The problem: trusting extraction at scale.
SEARCHABLE
OCR recovered the text
OCR made documents searchable, but search is not extraction. It can
recover text from scans, yet it does not understand what the text
means, map varied wording to requested fields, or show a reviewer
the evidence behind each extracted value.
UNDERSTANDABLE
AI understood the context
Chat-based AI tools made summaries and extraction possible across a
wide range of formats. But the approach breaks at scale: rate limits,
context limits, retries, copy-paste workflows, and outputs that drift
because each conversation is a little different.
OPERATIONAL
Scale changes the requirement
A team needs the same fields extracted the same way across every
document, with visible costs and a citation for each value. Otherwise
the work just moves from manual extraction to manual checking,
cleanup, and reconciliation.
From one-off prompts to repeatable workflows.
DataSnipe sits above OCR and LLMs. It uses each where it helps, then
wraps the extraction in the operational pieces needed for batch work.
01
Recover text
Use OCR where scans need it.
02
Extract fields
Apply one schema across every file.
03
Verify results
Review citations, confidence, and cost.
04
Compare models
Rerun and inspect results side by side.
Users define the fields they need, upload a batch of documents, choose a
model and budget, then review the same schema across every file.
Each result stays close to the source material: every extracted field has a
citation, every run has a visible cost, and every output is ready to
export into a spreadsheet or downstream review process.
The point is not to replace a good one-off ChatGPT extraction. It is to
make document extraction repeatable, predictable, and ready to review,
export, or run again.
Why now
Document extraction used to be constrained by OCR quality and brittle
rules. Now the models are good enough to understand varied document
formats, but the best model for a job can change quickly.
That makes comparison part of the workflow. Teams need to rerun the same
extraction against different providers, inspect the differences, and
decide which output is good enough for the work in front of them.
The pattern applies anywhere teams need structured data from inconsistent
document sets: invoices, receipts, contracts, research papers, and other
workflows where manual review is expensive but blind automation is not
acceptable.
See DataSnipe in action →
Founder
Meet Lorenzo
DataSnipe comes from a simple frustration: extraction is easy to demo,
but hard to trust, repeat, and use at scale.
Lorenzo Barasti is the founder of DataSnipe. He has spent more than a
decade building data-heavy products and engineering teams across
logistics, healthcare AI, data warehousing, and equity management.
His background in mathematics and production data systems shapes the
product: outputs should be structured enough for machines, traceable
enough for review, and repeatable enough for teams.